Archive for the ‘Teachings’ Category

FEAR – AMERICA CAN SLEEP EASY NOW

Tuesday, July 27th, 2010

We filed into court, quiet, respectful,  hoping against hope that the prisoner would be given the full  extent of the powers of the court. That she would receive a mild admonishment for her slight alleged infraction of the law, an error in judgement that anyone, even the most learned judge might make.

According to John Eligon of The New York Times, Thurs. July ,16th, Judge John Koeltl presided over the resentencing of Lynne Stewart after it was deemed that her first sentence of twenty-eight months was too light.  Lynne Stewart – the Terrorists’ Handmaid – will be tucked away for the next ten years.  Maybe she’ll make it in jail until she’s 90 though she’s got breast cancer.

You better watch out, America.  Didn’t she say,  “I’d do it again” ?  And that’s why they have to lock her up for a good, long time.  She’s “potentially lethal” said the prosecuting attorney, Mr Andrew Dember to the grey-haired, school-marm lawyer sitting in  front of him.

He should be feeling good now, Judge Koeltl, he’s done his duty.  Even though he received hundreds of letters attesting to Lynne’s honesty, virtue and loyalty; even though he heard her daughter burst into tears on hearing  the cruel verdict, he can rest easy.  He was so careful about all the necessary legal enhancements that will keep America safe, especailly since 9/11. They – the powers that prevail in this country today – are not stupid. They know a good opportunity when it happens.  9/11 was a gift from heaven – although devastating and horrible as it was – it gave them a chance to “enhance” our laws.   Enhance was once a pretty word – it usually meant to make nicer or better.  Not in this case!  Their aim is to destroy the liberties that the founders of our country fought so hard to create – now with new laws they can  sanction government interference between client and attorney,  wire-tapping and above all, intimidation of the legal profession into fear and ultimately, impotence.  Woe to a hapless victim who appears before the bench.  Between the lawyers’ fear and the enhanced laws, justice doesn’t stand a chance.

Why were we lulled into thinking she might given a mild, fitting sentence?  This isn’t medieval times when men were sentenced to life imprisonment or death for stealing a loaf of bread. We are reasonable people nowadays with reasonable laws – aren’t we?  Or is there now a deliberate choice to destroy all the civil liberties that followed those times? We listened so patiently as Koeltl struggled to justify the numbers of the various enhancements, wondering how he could have forgotten what was crucial to the sad woman sitting in front of him; enhancing prison numbers can do that to you. She was asked by Judge Koeltl why she doesn’t exhibit remorse – a strange question.  She is an innocent woman.  She has nothing to show remorse for.

No, Lynne, you didn’t  fail us.  We failed you.  We failed because we weren’t ready – too sanguine – perhaps stupid – but we should have known and been prepared for that verdict.  We should have proclaimed, exhorted, shouted – Lynne Stewart is innocent – she is guilty of nothing but being human.  She has never aided or abetted terrorists – she is just a good human being – the best among us.  It is the legal system that is now being perverted, destroyed and dishonoring America.  But it is more than that – it is the governing body – the Congress and the President that are guilty as well, playing their parts and letting it happen.

We must have courage.

- Lillian Pollak
reading the U. S. Constitution
July 4, 2010
for the Granny Peace Brigade

LYNNE STEWART HEARD A DEATH SENTENCE TODAY

Friday, July 16th, 2010

Federal Judge John G Koeltl passed down sentence today, 15 July 2010 on the defendant, Lynne Stewart: 120 months incarceration in the Danbury Federal Correctional Institution Connecticut on five counts to be served concurrently.

The 70 year old breast cancer survivor with a cancer now in remission has multiple health issues impacting on an already vulnerable and aging body. Lynne Stewart who has spent thirty years defending poor, oppressed, unpopular clients is to spend the next ten years of her life away from her husband and life partner, her adult children and numerous grandchildren.

Judge Koeltl in a lengthy statement told the now disbarred woman lawyer who started her professional career as a teacher in Harlem that his ruling followed the dictum of the appellate court which demanded he review the 28 months sentence given her one year ago for the crimes committed ten years ago. Today, he today reversed his previous sentence and in compliance with directives from the appellate court sentenced Lynne Stewart to ten years in prison.

Over and over again in his remarks leading up to the sentencing, Judge Koeltl used the term “terrorist enhancement.” Those warning words bring up the specter of some of the nastiest aspects of the Cold War and its present re-incarnation in the Patriot Act which by expanding law enforcement’s surveillance and investigative powers represents a significant threat to civil liberties. Read the official text… “Uniting and Strengthening America by providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism.

The Lynne Stewart case has been lifted out of the obscurity it might have had if the events of Nine Eleven had not transpired. Past and the now present White House Administration believe that by surrendering our freedoms, we are buying national security. Fighting terror has become a buzz word allowing us to accept heightened police presence and militarization domestically and abroad has kept us in two costly and unwinnable wars in Iraq and Afghanistan .

The verdict in Lynne Stewart’s Case should tell us that our country’s policies are still set in a miasma of confusion and controversy. Human security means full employment, jobs and health care for all, affordable housing, mass transit, improved and restored national infrastructure, education for all, the welfare of the old and the protection of the young –these are the solid bases for true national security. What rankles most in the Patriot Act are those provisions that sweep normal criminal law enforcement under the looser procedural standards for fighting terror. It’s important and vital that the state be able to fight terror. No one disputes this. But it’s equally important that the state not use the war on terror to gut the warrant requirement or undermine the First Amendment.

But the state must recognize that poverty is a weapon of mass destruction that brings terror to millions of our people; recognize that banks and financial institutions under whatsoever names they now call themselves are harbingers of terror with foreclosures, plant closings, environmental devastations like the BP Gulf of Mexico debacle.

The death sentence imposed on a seventy year old woman has sent a message that the term “terror”, “terrorism” can be used to stifle dissent, to silence voices, to let the powers that be trample over the rights of ordinary citizens. Those of us in the peace movement, the anti-war movement, the anti-racism movement, the environmental movement, the movement for a just immigration policy must continue our struggles. This is what Lynne Stewart wants us to do. Her sacrifice will not be in vain if we continue these vital grass roots movement for a just and humane society.

We owe that to our beloved Lynne Stewart, the People’s Lawyer. We got your back, Lynne. La luta continua!

- Vinie Burrows

UN Rep for the Women’s International Democratic Federation

Founding member of the GRANNY PEACE BRIGADE

Awarded the Paul Robeson Award by Actors Equity Association

Forum on The U.S. and the ABOLITION of NUCLEAR WEAPONS

Tuesday, April 13th, 2010

Interested activists gathered at The Riverside Church on Sunday, March 28, 2010 for a forum on The U.S. and the Abolition of Nuclear Weapons sponsored by the Granny Peace Brigade, The Mission and Social Justice Department of The Riverside Church and the Black Radical Congress, New York Chapter.  The United Nations Five Year Review of the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty, scheduled for May 2010, will involve many nations in that review, so the forum was timely.  Peace advocates want to ensure that their voices are heard before the official review, especially to push for the elimination of weapons in the lifetime, for example, of President Obama who has said this would not happen in his lifetime.

The Reverend Thomas of The Riverside Church welcomed those present and said that the church was supportive of the forum’s goals and for years had promoted reconciliation between and among individuals and nations.  Vinie Burrows, Actor, Writer and UN Representative for the Women’s International Democratic Federation, moderated the program.   In honor of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., Ms. Burrows read a portion of his speech, Quest for Peace and Justice.

The first speaker, Frida Berrigan, a Writer and Associate with the Arms and Security Initiative of the New America Foundation provided background on the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty, which was signed by 170 countries in 1970.  Five nations were Nuclear Weapons States (NWS) at the time of the treaty’s signing: USA, USSR, China, France and Great Britain.  Now there are nine [the added nuclear powers are India, Pakistan, North Korea and Israel].  Signing countries without nuclear weapons are called Non-Nuclear Weapon States, or NNWS.  An NNWS nation could be provided with a “carrot” to encourage them to forego nuclear weapons: help with establishing nuclear energy.  Two countries mentioned by Ms. Berrigan which had intended to develop nuclear weapons but discontinued doing so are Brazil and South Africa.

She also discussed nuclear energy, nuclear waste, the cost of both weapons and energy, and the political situation.

About weapons: The US has 27,000 nuclear warheads.  President Obama’s budget request for research and development of nuclear weapons for FY 2011 [Oct. 2010 – Sept. 2011] is $7 billion.  Non nuclear weapons also continue to be developed by the US, some with power comparable to the smallest “tactical” nuclear weapons, although still 1000 times weaker than the Hiroshima bomb.

The offer of $7 billion to weapons firms was a starting salvo on the complex problem of getting approval in Congress for an agreement to destroy weapons.  The problem is that US and Russia will be signing a START (Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty) agreement on April 8th this year, which will call for reductions in the number of missiles that each side has, both deployed and in reserve.  The $7 billion is an attempt to buy the acquiescence of the nuclear component of the military industrial complex in this reduction, since they would otherwise tell their friends in Congress to kill the treaty.

About energy:  Development of nuclear energy requires uranium which is highly toxic in its extraction from the ground, in testing of weapons and, after it is used, when it is “waste.”  The US government has established National Sacrifice Zones, which have been rendered unfit for human beings forever.  These areas, in several western states, were deemed by Native Americans as sacred ground for religious reasons, and they have been grievously harmed by the policies of all Federal administrations since 1940.

Currently the US has 104 nuclear reactors which produce 20% of the nation’s power, as well as 2,000 metric tons of waste annually.  Meanwhile, 75,000 tons accumulated over years await a storage location.  Due to accidents in the industry from 1973 and later, no new reactors have been build for over 30 years.  Now, however, for FY 2011 the administration has offered $54 billion in loans to help nuclear power development firms develop 26 new nuclear reactors, at a cost of $12 billion each.

Fortunately the Yucca mountain site which for years was targeted to receive nuclear waste has been ruled not eligible to be the waste disposal reservoir, because scientists discovered that the area is crossed by a large number of geologic faults, among many reasons.  Ms. Berrigan urged participation in a War Resisters’ League’s action on May 3rd to declare Grand Central Station a nuclear weapon-free zone.

At the end of Ms. Berrigan’s talk we viewed a 20 minute excerpt of a documentary film by John Pilger titled “Stealing A Nation.” The film documented the Crimes Against Humanity perpetrated on the previous residents of Diego Garcia by Great Britain, in collusion with the US which wanted the site [an island in the Indian Ocean] for military purposes.  Its residents had lived there peacefully for three or more generations although Great Britain claimed they were transients.  Their expulsion began quietly in 1965, but was intensified brutally between 1968 and 1973.  First they were subject to withdrawal of imported goods and then all the dogs owned by the residents were killed [by poison gas], among other injustices.  They were then moved from one place to another, subjected to fraud and placed in housing without plumbing; many died of sadness as a result of these atrocities.   The 2000 residents of this tiny island nation were persecuted and had been ignored for decades until, in the 1990’s, evidence of the fraudulent removal of the population was uncovered in Great Britain.

Dr. Horace G. Campbell, Syracuse University Professor in African American Studies, International Relations and Political Science, was the next speaker.  He praised the important civil rights and peacemaking role played by The Riverside Church and noted Dr. King’s speech therein on April 4, 1967 named Beyond Vietnam, in which he dwelt on how to repair our humanity and called on listeners to develop a new ethos.

Dr. Campbell stated that a radical break in the social organization of society is needed.  All of life and society should be organized to enable everyone to live healthy and whole lives.  The current practice of excessive military spending and the profiteering by banks, insurance companies, and the military industrial complex constitute oppression.  Citizens can be seen as accessories to the warlike policies of their nation.

These horrors are perpetrated by the myth that the people of the US are chosen people who can bring progress and development and freedom to other peoples.  This is accomplished by plunder of lands of others which is not just an unfortunate by-product of what we seemingly set out to accomplish — it is what is intended.  The peace movement has to focus attention on prevalent falsehoods that belong back in the 17th, 18th and 19th centuries such as: individual self interest, and the capitalist idea that land and peoples can be taken in the name of profit, patriarchy and sexism.

Dr. Campbell then spoke of Africa, the Pelindaba Treaty and Diego Garcia.   The treaty states that Africa is a nuclear free area.  Twenty-nine (29) nations have ratified the Treaty which went into effect on July 15, 2009.

Nuclear Weapons States were invited to ratify the treaty and not place weapons in Africa.  France, China and Britain have ratified, but Russia has not because of the placement of US weapons on Diego Garcia.  Although Britain signed the treaty, it believes the treaty does not apply to DG because, it says, Diego Garcia is part of the British Indian Ocean Territory, not Africa.  The U.S. has not signed the treaty and also does not recognize DG as being subject to the treaty.

Dr. Campbell also recounted other instances of colonial powers’ activities in Africa, which constitute devastating indictments of the ills of colonialism, such as the treatment of the Congo by King Leopold of Belgium.    He said the peace movement needs to pressure governments of the Western Powers to discontinue support for dictators such as Mobuto, who ruled for 37 years.  He criticized aspects of the movement which seeks to “protect” troubled developing areas such as Darfur.  He stated that Africans don’t want humanitarian saviors, and mentioned a book called Saviors and Survivors, by Mahmood Mamdani, that discusses the importance of self determination by developing nations and the frequent tendency of wealthy nations to act first and understand later.

Dr. Campbell pointed to actions taken by the Women’s movement to improve health.  He noted that activities by corporate development firms, such as oil companies, have lead to a decline in life expectancy in Africa from 50 years to 37 years, such as the deleterious effects of corrupt corporate activities by Shell Oil Company’s in Nigeria.  Multi-national firms enable corruption by the leaders in underdeveloped nations and prevent improvement of life for the majority of the populations.

Dr. Campbell said that the Peace Movement needs to support President Obama in his quest to resolve the problem of Israel and Palestine.  He said that peace in the Middle East will not be achieved until this problem is solved.

The final speaker was Judith LeBlanc, Coordinator, 2010 International Planning Committee (IPC) for Nuclear Abolition, Peace and Justice , and member of Peace Action.  Ms. LeBlanc described the upcoming Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty [NPT] meetings at the U.N., a conference preceding that event at The Riverside Church (April 30th and May 1st) and a March and Rally planned for May 2nd.  She stressed the need for everyone to continue gathering signatures on a petition to President Obama urging him to work toward nuclear weapon abolition.  Ms. LeBlanc reported that the disarmament movement in Japan has collected five million names.  She urged attendees to take the NPT material she had provided.   Her message was – Organize, Educate, Activate and Mobilize to make Visible the Need for Disarmament.

A Q. & A. session followed and then The Raging Grannies sang songs about the need to end war and help people, and to close military bases.  Vinie Burrows brought the Forum to a conclusion with thanks to all participants and attendees, and encouraged people to take literature available on tables at both sides of the room.

- Edith Cresmer
for the Granny Peace Brigade

CLOSE U.S. MILITARY BASES IN THE PACIFIC

Monday, November 30th, 2009

GRANNY PEACE BRIGADE TEACH-IN at HUNTER COLLEGE/CUNY
November 8, 2009

The audience of about 100 people was welcomed by Carmelina Cartei, Women and Gender Studies Department of Hunter College.

Vinie Burrows, actress, poet and our moderator, described the background of the teach-ins and the formation of the “No-Bases” committee of the Granny Peace Brigade. The committee was founded to stand up against the “New World Disorder” that US bases have created.

Pete Bronson of Korean War Veterans for Peace emphasized that the Korean War has not formally ended, even after 1.5 million Koreans have died. He directed us to the website endthekoreanwar.com for information and ways to become involved.

Pete emphasized that all are welcome to join with Veterans for Peace, Iraq Veterans Against War and Viet Nam Vets against the war in advocating for the rights of active duty soldiers, and in continuing to lobby for an end to the engagements in Iraq and Afghanistan.

(7-minute YouTube video summary)

Here are highlights from each of the three presenters:

Joseph Gerson, Director of Programs for American Friends Service Committee.

A photo sent to Gerson from Okinawa on the day of the teach-in showed hundreds of thousands of demonstrators protesting the US presence in Okinawa, on that day, and demanding the return of their airfield from the U.S. military.

The people of Okinawa clearly want us to know how actively they themselves are protesting the bases and the destruction they have wrought on their island. Okinawans are particularly outraged that a US base is planned on landfill over a coral reef. This base will destroy the ecology and beauty of the place forever.

The US has over 100 military bases in Japan, and through secret treaties has also a nuclear weapons presence there which is political anathema to the Japanese people. The history of Okinawa is one of loss of dignity and sovereignty. The country was an independent kingdom for 200 years, then invaded and conquered by Japan, finally losing ¼ of its population in 1944 in WW II. Because of the mixed racial nature of Okinawans they have been treated as a dumping ground by Japan. Most of the 40,000 US troops in Japan are in Okinawa. 28 percent of Okinawa is occupied by US bases. In the center of a large city in Okinawa is a helicopter strip creating terrible noise and bad air.

Virginia Rodino, Asia Pacific Freeze Campaign and Veterans for Peace-Korea Peace Campaign.

The Korean War has not formally ended.  3,000,000 Koreans having died during the period of active combat, there is a strong wish for peace and unification of the country among Korean people. The Asia Pacific Freeze Campaign led to a candlelight vigil movement involving huge numbers of Korean people. In 2005,six nations agreed to denuclearize the Korean Peninsula ( U.S., Japan, China, Russia and North and South Korea ). Nonetheless, the U.S. continued to demonize N. Korea as a stand-in for China because that important trading partner can’t be targeted. As long as N. Korea can be accused of an interest in nuclear warfare, the excuse for maintaining strong U.S. base presence in S. Korea continues. Both China and S. Korea import large quantities of U.S. manufactured arms. In May 2008 Korean people, concerned about contamination by mad cow disease, staged mass protests against the importation of U.S. beef. The protests were violently put down by the government. The Korean people want to go on with their lives and pursue their common destiny apart from U.S. domination and military base presence.

Ninotchka Roska, Philippine-born activist, novelist, former political prisoner, founder of Gabriela Network/USA, a multiracial women’s solidarity movement.

There have been U.S. bases in the Philippines since 1898. Manila was terribly devastated during W.W. II. The Philippines are very familiar with the way military culture leads to violence and the oppression and exploitation of women. For example, in the Philippines an estimated 50,000 children were fathered by U.S. soldiers since 1945. None of these children receive the healthcare, housing and education which are benefits of U.S. military families. The story of Nicole, a 22 year-old student who has fought for justice in the prosecution of her rape by a US officer points out the way U.S. Service personnel are exempt from prosecution by the judiciary systems of the home nations of Asian bases.

- Caroline Chinlund
for the Granny Peace Brigade

Open letter to President Barak Obama Urging Cessation of U.S. Military Action in Afghanistan

Tuesday, November 17th, 2009

Dear Mr. President,

Strongly do I support your careful weighing of options for continuation of United States engagement in Afghanistan. I am, of course, appalled by the civilian deaths resulting from our ground and air military action. It is noted that Defense Secretary Robert Gates has himself acknowledged the counter-productive effects of civilian deaths resulting from military engagement. He described the killing of civilians as “one of our greatest strategic vulnerabilities” (‘New York Times,’ June 13, 2009). It is significant that  Admiral Mike Mullen, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, has said that senior officers must work to prevent the militarization of American foreign policy (‘New York Times,’ January 12, 2009). Former First Lady Laura Bush on her return from Afghanistan made the point on Meet the Press, November 30, 2008, that there were so many Afghan widows.

For humanitarian reasons and in our national interest I would urge the scheduling of military combat forces draw-down, establishment of a United Nations short-term security force mission, and re-direction of U.S. engagement in Afghanistan to the development of non-military programs for reconstruction and rehabilitation, in collaboration with the Government of Afghanistan.

In your speech last week at Elmendorf Air Force Base in Alaska, you told a military audience that you would only commit more forces to Afghanistan if it is vital to U.S. interests and receives public support and that “I will not risk your lives unless it is necessary to America’s vital interests” (‘Staten Island Advance,’ November 13, 2009). It is my understanding that the interests now considered vital are (a) rendering al-Qaeda unable to pursue its operations and (b) weakening the Taliban’s influence. In this regard I noted and quote the following [Cato (Institute) - "Recognizing the Limits of American Power in Afghanistan" by Doug Bandow; the article appeared in the 'Huffington Post' on October 31, 2009]:

“The critical issue is Washington’s objective. The U.S. long ago achieved its goal of displacing and weakening al-Qaeda (despite the failure to capture or kill Osama bin Laden) and ousting the Taliban government which gave the organization refuge. That success persists despite recent Taliban gains. National Security Adviser James Jones estimated fewer than 100 al-Qaeda members are operating in Afghanistan, and said they have “no bases, no ability to launch attacks on us or our allies.”

I was indeed pleased to learn that General Karl Eikenberry, the U.S. Ambassador to Afghanistan, supports the assignment of civilian personnel to Afghanistan in fields such as agriculture, and that the State Department has attempted to accommodate his requests (‘New York Times,’ November 12, 2009). Certainly, expenditures for humanitarian aid, community development, and reconstruction should replace military expenditures for programs designed to meet needs identified by Afghan agencies and organizations. A relevant example of such a program was recently described (‘New York Times,’ November 13, 2009) – community participation in a Village Council in Jurm resulted in the village obtaining a grant which enabled local workers and an engineer to carry out a clean water development project – a small but important project.

Authorization for continuation and intensification of U.S. military operations in Afghanistan would, I believe,  severely lessen the potential for your administration’s success in drawing support for domestic programs and for your other foreign policy objectives.

I hope that revisions in U.S. policy with regard to Afghanistan would include, inter alia, the following:

- cessation of military action in Afghanistan and in Pakistan

- establishment of just system of reparations for civilian casualties and for local destruction

- removal of land mines

- withdrawal of military forces

- negotiations with all parties concerned (including the Taliban, as it is a significant part of the
citizenry and will not be ignored)

- provision of financial aid for programs identified by Afghan authorities/agencies/local councils,
to be executed by local workers and Afghan organizations to the extent possible;
if necessary, civilian personnel of other institutions/organizations to be identified by the Afghan authorities/agencies/local councils

- support for establishment of a United Nations short-term security force mission

In my end-the-war activities, I often meet people who have lost loved ones in this conflict and family members of posted military personnel who are struggling emotionally/financially. This is indicative of the dreadful vortex -

‘died as part of the Afghan war and related operations:
BROCHU, Jordan M., 20, Pfc., Army.
WALSHE, Tyler R., 21, Specialist Army.
WELCH, Jonathan D., 19, Specialist Army.’
This should be unacceptable to all.

Respectfully submitted,
- Barbara Walker
for the Granny Peace Brigade

The GPB at the Social Justice Society of Stern College for Women

Monday, October 26th, 2009

On Tuesday October 20, a group of Granny Peace Brigade members gave a presentation to the Social Justice Society of Stern College for Women  organized by Tamara Freieden a board member of the Social Justice Society.

2009_10_20tamara.jpg

The students were a very lively group of about 14 women and one man. Many of them were from other states and we told them how to reach their Congressional Representatives and Senators; one had already visited a congressional office in person.

2009_10_20carol.jpg

Carol Huston described the beginnings of the Granny Peace Brigade including the Times Square enlistment attempt, the trial and the gradual development of committees devoted to No Bases, Counter Recruitment and Legislation.

Representatives of the committees spoke:

  • Vinie Burroughs spoke about No-Bases and its origin in an Women’s International Democratic Federation meeting in Caracas, also mentioning the up-coming Teach-In on Pacific bases.

2009_10_20vinie.jpg

  • Barbara Harris spoke [with display and hand-outs] about Counter Recruitment and some of the students said they’d been subjected to attempts to recruit them — but obviously they took another path.

2009_10_20barbara.jpg

  • Eva-Lee Baird spoke about the approach of the Legislative Committee, researching legislation and holding phone-a-thons.
  • Edith Cresmer demonstrated a call to Senator Schumer, using a cell phone set on speakerphone provided by one of the students. The students listened carefully as Edith left a “stop funding the wars” message on the answering machine in Schumer’s Buffalo office.

2009_10_20eande.jpg

As we were wrapping up we were asked to sing, and we sang “Voters [God] Help America.” That got a big applause.

At the end of the presentation theater lovers came over to Vinie asking what she is appearing in, and she told them she was in a play now and also in rehearsals. One student gave Vinie her email so Vinie could send her the information about her current activities. Students were interested in Counter Recruitment, and they want to follow up – helping high school students to fill out basic forms, and use the internet to find financial aid programs. They also asked about more information on the two Israeli refuseniks that recently visited NYC.

- Edith Cresmer
for the Granny Peace Brigade

College Career Fair at Murry Bergtraum

Sunday, March 29th, 2009

Friday, March 27th, Barbara Walker (Granny Peace Brigade) and I went to Murry Bergtraum HS at noon to participate in the College Career Fair event. Since this was our first invite, I didn’t know what to expect, but knew that we needed something different to attract students to our table. Students were coming to the Career Fair to learn more about colleges, not to address the issue of countering military recruitment.

Anne Gibbons (CodePink NYC) designed a bright, attractive and engaging art board for our display. Our basic message for the day was – You Can Go to College Without Joining the Military.

2009_03_27college-fair.jpg

Anne’s colorful tri-fold board addresses Truths and Myths of military promises by using drawings of seven students and statements he/she thinks to be true about military experience. A paper survey ‘What Do You Think?’ about each statement, accompanied the board display. After each student completed the survey, we discussed what is true or not true. This led to new understandings and insights for the student, and we realized this was an exceptional educational opportunity. The students were comfortable with the board display and wanted to learn more about their own misconceptions. Deanna Tilley, from AFSC, shared the table with us, and we were able to hand out the AFSC card of 17 Questions to Ask a Military Recruiter which complimented our message. We also gave out the new Options for Life After High School flyer, which was right on target with their basic needs.

More than 25 colleges were represented. Army, Navy, Marine recruiters had the first 3 tables as you entered the Career Fair. The military recruiters had give-aways, computers for use to explore military websites, and forms for the students to fill out about interests and for potential financial benefits. There you go – all the information a recruiter needs was spelled out for them.

A representative from Baruch College noted that in his 11 years at College Fairs, he had never seen a table like ours offering options and alternatives to the military. He though it was great and should be at every College Fair, which was encouraging.

Barbara, Deanna and I shared information that students needed and to which they responded. The Truth or Myth display board was a huge hit – It made all the difference in creating a bright, open and inviting environment and proved to be the magnet to help us achieve what we had set out to do.

Many thanks to Anne Gibbons for her creativity and generous time given to create the display.

The 7 statements: Truth or Myth? What do You Think?

  1. Joining the military is the only way I can pay for college!
  2. The military will train me in the field I want to work.
  3. The military protects women from sexual harassment.
  4. If I join the military, I’ll get to see the world.
  5. They won’t send me to a war zone if I don’t want to go.
  6. I can always resign and leave the military.
  7. Post Traumatic Stress Syndrome wouldn’t be a big problem for me.

- Barbara Harris
Counter-Recruitment Committee

STOP SEXUAL ABUSE IN THE MILITARY

Monday, March 9th, 2009

The Granny Peace Brigade takes the message to the March 6 Social Change at Fair Hunter College.

2009_03_06tryptich.jpg

Did you know:
• Since 2002, over 66,000 women in the military have been victims of sexual abuse or rape.
• Incidents of rape and sexual assault in the military increased 73% between 2004 and 2006.
• In one VA center alone, 41% of female vets reported being the targets of sexual abuse while enlisted.
• 29% reported being victims of rape during their tour of duty.

H. Con. Res. 28 introduced by Representative Jane Harman (CA) is the first step in bringing desperately needed changes to the Department of Defense’s policies and procedures in handling cases of rape and sexual assault on women in the military. It calls for the Department Of Defense developing an effective, pro-active strategy for investigating and prosecuting cases of sexual abuse.

Rape and other acts of sexual assault against women in the U.S. Armed Forces have skyrocketed since 2002, including a staggering 73% increase in reported incidents from 2004 to 2006. These assaults are committed by U.S. military personnel, however the Department of Defense has failed to support the victims of this abuse. Investigations into reported instances have been inadequate, and prosecution and punishment almost nonexistent. Don’t stand by, stand up for the victims.

2009_03_06caller.jpg

Grass Roots Action Technical Notes:
We asked the students to call their representatives on the spot. If they didn’t know who their representatives were we helped them find out. We explained that H. CON. RES. 28 is in committee and will not will not come up for a vote any time soon. When calling about recently introduced legislation that has been referred to a committee we ask our representatives to co-sponsor the legislation — unless they already have signed on. In that case we thank them.

2009_03_06fran_table.jpg

Do you know who your representative is? Find and contact your elected officials via http://www.congress.org/congressorg/home/

- Eva-Lee Baird and Fran Sears for the Granny Peace Brigade
Photos: Eva-Lee Baird

INTERNATIONAL WOMEN’S DAY:

Sunday, March 8th, 2009

A GRANNY ATTENDS A CODE PINK SPONSORED SCREENING OF A FILM ABOUT THE WOMEN OF AFGHANISTAN

Fahima Vorgetts put on a blue scarf. She said, “I felt warm earlier, so I took it off, but I”m putting it back on because it was given to me by the women of Afghanistan and I wear it to remind you for them, don’t forget about us: don’t go away and let what you have learned today fade into the every day coming and going of your lives.”

It was International Women’s Day and we had watched Kathleen Foster’s film “Afghan Women: A History of Struggle.” After watching this well-told history of the events affecting the legal, economic and social status of Afghan women over the past 35 or so years, the shame I felt over being a US citizen was overwhelming. I took out my camera, and after receiving a nod of permission from her, I captured this photo of a person who has spent her adulthood working for a better life for her sisters. You see the blue scarf.

2009_03_08fahima_vorgetts_sm.jpg

What it means to me today is that there are people in Afghanistan whose well being has been directly affected by the military interference of the U.S. through the CIA and now, overtly. They are not better off for our government’s military involvement. I learned in Foster’s film that the warlords now holding the reins of power under Karzai’s government in Afghanistan are the ones setting the tone for law and government. These guys are holding on to their turf, to their well-equipped militias, to their ways of currying popular support by espousing fundamentalism. They are not much different from the Taliban. They have definitely not liberated the women of Afghanistan.

In that country as you read this, women’s rights activists are being assassinated by representatives of the government which Karzai doesn’t really control. Women, men and children are constantly suffering violence. The weapons readily available and plentiful, supplied by the U.S., Saudi Arabia and others are easily bought by warlords who profit from trafficking in Opium.

U.S. military involvement will not help. U.S. aid goes 80 or 90 percent to US military contractors or local gatekeepers. Fahima Vorgetts says she is able to deliver a fine well with fresh water to a community through her organization Afghan Women’s Fund for $10,000, while a contractor will bid $27,000 or more for the same job.

So what does the blue scarf say to me? Keep working against military involvement in Afghanistan. Support organizations led by Afghan people which can build schools and dig wells. Have the courage to bring the shameful situation into bright light and discourage people from careers in the military.

Learn more about Fahima Vorgetts’ organization at www.womenforafghanwomen.org. See the film by contacting www.kathleenfoster.com.

- Caroline Chinlund, Granny Peace Brigade

Security Without Empire

Sunday, March 8th, 2009

National Organizing Conference on Foreign Military Bases – American University in Washington, DC – Friday, February 27 to Monday, March 2, 2009. Coordinator was Joseph Gerson of AFSC.

2009_03signs.jpg

Seven Grannies attended – Barbara H, Bev, Carol, Caroline, Nydia, Pat and Phyllis.  A total of 200 participated with 24 representatives from overseas – Czech Republic, Ecuador, Germany, Guam, Hawaii, Italy, Korea, Netherlands, Okinawa, and Vieques.

This was the Granny Peace Brigade’s first sponsorship of a national conference and allowed us to network with other organizations here and abroad working on the issue of No Bases.

Thanks to Vinie’s work with the Women’s International Democratic Federation when she, together with Carol and Phyllis, attended the WIDF Congress in April 2007 – the GPB has reason to take pride. We were the first to recognize the need to educate the US/NYC public about the bases and to work to shut them down. We have pioneered this through our Teach-Ins, phone-a-thons, website, etc. etc.

To be brief, the Conference was excellent in every important respect and this report cannot convey all of the energy, intelligence, and warm interactions that we experienced.
The aims of the Conference were:

  • To move toward an ultimate goal of closing and reducing the number of foreign bases, as well as the clean up of military base sites;
  • To further integrate anti-bases networks and organizations into a more coherent movement;
  • To share and disseminate information about U.S. foreign military bases and resistance;
  • To develop new strategies for the U.S. anti-bases movement.

The Conference clearly succeeded in the first three areas and a good start was made on the fourth.

Friday evening at the Pentagon: We gathered at 4 pm in the protest area designated by the Pentagon. There had been a light rain which stopped and as we identified ourselves to others we hung our GPB banner on the fence. Outside the fence a long string of police watched and Art Laffin of Catholic Workers said CW has held a vigil for 22 years on Monday mornings from 7 to 8 a.m. Jonah House (Berrigans) have vigiled for 37 years there. Our friend, Jun Soto and another Buddhist were there with their drum on their walk from upstate NY.

We formed a circle and started a started a brief program with a ceremony requesting permission to stand there from representatives of the Piscataway tribe on whose land it was originally. Then into a large bowl placed on the earth in the center of our circle, those of us who brought vials of water poured it in – Okinawa, Italy, Japan, Hawaii, Maine, Manhattan, Brooklyn, Queens, Croton, etc. This opening of the conference was deeply moving. The mood was one respect for the earth and all its creatures with a sense of both formality and friendliness.

Program at American University: The main speaker at the opening plenary was Zia Mian (physicist from Pakistan teaching at Princeton) and he spoke pointedly about the 4 crises the US faces: war, the economy, energy, and a lack of confidence in America’s future. He referred to Obama as a “Restorationist” trying to rebuild the American Dream, not a “Radical” but the Dream is based on Empire. [More of Zia in Bruce Gagnon's report.]

2009_03diagonalgroup_sm.jpg

The conference program was jam-packed and, as invariably happens, it was tough deciding which workshop or meeting to attend. The other plenary sessions were excellent with powerful testimony by the overseas guests relating the destructive and toxic impact of the bases on their communities in all areas — social, cultural, economic, environmental.

In the interest of time or for more specifics on the variety of workshops and the titles of the plenary sessions, please visit the conference website. Also, check out these reports: Bruce Gagnon’s March 5 report, and John Lindsay-Poland’s report.
Our Granny Table was set up in a corridor with Laurie’s “We will not be Silent” T-shirts, our buttons, MLK speeches booklet, war budget pens and a sign – Donations Accepted. We generated $375 giving $200 to Laurie and the balance to GPB. Because of a conference shortfall, as individuals we contributed $75 with $25 from the proceeds for a total of $100 which Joe Gerson appreciated.

Our workshop in the afternoon (Taking it to the Grassroots: Granny Peace Brigade Strategies for Informing the Public) went very well, even if attendance was slim.

2009_03workshop.jpg

There were 3 women from Okinawa; one from Tokyo; two from Atlanta Grandmothers for Peace who treated us like royalty; one man with a petition, and Steve Chinlund enlisted on video by Joe Friendly who was elsewhere. One person from San Diego couldn’t stay but needed C/R info from Barbara. With Phyllis moderating, we all did our reports and Caroline with Bev staged a phone-a-thon encounter which everyone loved. Post-presentation our attendees were engaged and would have continued talking but we needed eat and then do the evening plenary.

Evening Plenary The featured speakers were Raed Jarrar (Iraq AFSC), Jana Glivicka (Czech Rep.) Suzuyo Takazato (Okinawa) and Gualdemar Jimenez (Ecuador).  All presenters were superb.

Patriotic and anti-Military Fashion Show This was terrific and worth describing in detail.

2009_03bev_2fashions1.jpg

For the record though, Bev was one of the stars, first in orange jumpsuit and black hood for Witness Against Torture and minutes later in a Granny outfit complete with a Power of the Purse, black balloon, and photos of her grandchildren.

Sunday Plenary On extremely short notice Phyllis Bennis stepped in to replace the featured speaker, Walden Bello from Manila, and was thrilling in her brilliant, focused and funny style. She emphasized that things have changed in DC. so now is the time to figure out what we need to do. Obama never mentioned bases in his Inaugural address and a new definition of “empire” is taking shape. The time is ripe for pursuing base closings in view of the possible savings of $140 billion, with Barney Frank’s proposal of a 25% cut in the military budget, and the 50-50 split on the legitimacy of an Afghan war. Our movement should say: WE HAVE THE ANSWER!
We packed up and went for dinner, planning to do lobbying the following day – Monday – but weather intervened.

- Nydia Leaf
Photos: Phyllis Cunningham