Archive for February, 2009

Granny Peace Brigade and Code Pink Phone-a-thon

Wednesday, February 11th, 2009

February 5 – Port Authority Bus Terminal

A quartet of Grannies ready to engage with travelers fed up with war and its weapons, especially cluster bombs.

2009_02_05_2.jpg
How can the US hold off signing the Oslo accord when 94 other nations agreed to ban cluster bombs? Some soldiers past and present want to talk with us about it. What’s our objection to cluster bombs? “They did us a lot of good in Viet Nam. They’re an effective weapon!” We have to talk about civilian casualty, the unexploded bomblets going off years later, destroying children. We get a look that says, “you’re right about that part.”  And none of our military passersby seem enthusiastic about more war right now.

It’s hard to get through to Washington. The switchboard is busy; offices too. We hope this means more people are more involved. Keep calling, people!

2009_02_05_1.jpg

Lillian P. gives out a lot of lit., nobody can say no to Lillian, so people are reading! We have New Jersey info now, maps and phone numbers of N.J. legislators, voters stop to get info and say they’ll call from home The way we see it, a call on the spot is the key to recruiting a new activist. We’ll keep encouraging that and hope the congressional switchboard adds more lines so people get through right away.
- Caroline Chinlund for Eva-Lee, Edith and Lillian P.
photos: Eva-Lee Baird

Ban Cluster Bombs

Tuesday, February 3rd, 2009

Wintry Thursday. Indoors at NYC’s Port Authority Bus Terminal are seven grannies with permits for “expressive use” of the space. We set up the Peace table, our anchor, for a phone-a-thon. We’re inviting voters to call their legislators with their views on what needs doing. Today’s urgent message: “Ban Cluster Bombs.” With the pain of recent civilian suffering in Gaza fresh in people’s minds, feels like a good day for conversation.

009_01_29phoneathon2.jpg

Barbara H. finds people want to know, “What is this about??” It’s an emotional issue. Children dying from unexploded bomblets! People are outraged. Why didn’t the U.S. sign along with the 94 nations who prohibited use of cluster bombs in Oslo in December 2008? Yes, of course we’ll call our representatives!

009_01_29phoneathon1.jpg

They can use our pink quarter-sheet handout with Congressional Switchboard number (202-224-3121) and name of the joint resolution for signing the Oslo Declaration and banning the use, sale and transfer of cluster bombs. It’s S.J.RES.37 & H.J.RES.91. Two soldiers, on duty, initially tell Phyllis they don’t know what a cluster bomb is. They listen to an explanation and take fliers to read. Edith senses since the election of Obama, people are readier to believe voters matter.

009_01_29phoneathon3.jpg

Important to let legislators know what we want for our people! Raging Granny Mercy sings “Obama We Don’t Need the War” during a moment of quiet as Albert, a French journalist making a film on U.S. activism, films. People who recognize us offer high fives. A big school group stops with questions: “Where are these weapons manufactured???”

Eva-Lee says afterward, “it feels good to be taking this baby-step in the public use of privately owned public space.

- Caroline Chinlund,  for Bev, Barbara W, Nydia, Barbara H, Mercy, Eva-Lee, Edith, & Phyllis
photos: Eva-Lee Baird
Granny Peace Brigade

Dear President Obama, Please Build Not Bomb Afghanistan

Sunday, February 1st, 2009

Dear Mr. President:

I am of course aware of the various pressures exerted by lobbyists, including contractors, weapons manufacturers, foreign and domestic political partisans, on your Administration, toward the end of keeping the wars going on and if possible expanding them. However, it is significant that Admiral Mike Mullen, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, has said that “senior officers must work to prevent the militarization of American foreign policy…” (‘New York Times,’ January 13, 2009). The ‘New York Times’ went on to say “The military is engaged in deep soul-searching over the proper role of the armed forces in foreign policy.” (I realize this has broad implications.) “The debate has been inspired by the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq….” It could be noted that the list of ‘Names of the Dead’ at the end of the article were the names of three service members – all killed in Afghanistan. Is this to be our next Viet Nam? I mention the much mentioned Eisenhower warning about the military/industrial (and I understand he wanted to include ‘congressional’) complex. Defense Secretary Rumsfeld was not fired; General MacArthur was!

Mr. President, why is there planning for the funneling of our military personnel from Iraq into Afghanistan? Originally it was said that we were in Afghanistan to look for Osama bin Laden. Well we know what happened then — we let him go. The Taliban? The Ambassador of Afghanistan to the United States indicated on “Meet the Press,” November 30, 2008, that the Taliban must be dealt with — that it should be brought into talks, not for power sharing but for the purpose of working on solutions. Former First Lady Laura Bush on the same program said, regarding Afghanistan and its needs: “There are so many widows.” Afghanistan is not ‘the good war’ but unfortunately many are picking up ‘the good war’ chant.

Former Finnish President Martii Ahtisaari, who has been awarded the Nobel Peace Prize, managed and oversaw, after Namibia’s long and bitter war with South Africa, the massive UN supervised operation which led to elections and the independence of that country. UN staff, international police and military personnel, contracted personnel  locally recruited translators/interpreters, clerical, administrative staff, and others, as required, were employed. The mission worked in collaboration with community leaders over the whole of that geographically large country to prepare for the elections. The situations and operational requirements in Namibia clearly were not as in Afghanistan but there are some common factors. One personnel matter that worked to the benefit of the operation in Namibia was that there were relatively few U.S. nationals assigned to the operation; therefore, there was not a large U.S. ‘footprint.’
Mr. President, consultation with President Ahtisaari could be useful. Please do not be led into continued military action in Afghanistan and another deadly debacle.

Mr. President, when during your campaign you spoke of our troops leaving Iraq and then you spoke of their deployment to Afghanistan, my heart and the heart of many sank! As you know, there are persons knowledgeable about Afghanistan — situation, history, societies, cultures, geography (e.g. Rory Stewart, Herbert Bix) — who have stressed, among other matters, need for economy, institution, infrastructure rebuilding, rather than U.S. military action.

Certainly there is awareness of the question how best can the skills of our service members now deployed in Iraq and Afghanistan and returning home en masse be applied, but continuing the waging of war to avoid developing a solution would not be moral or practical.

Mr. President, last evening, January 30th, on “Bill Moyers Journal,” Dr. Marilyn Young, Professor of History, New York University, cogently stated how terribly ill-advised is U.S. military action in Afghanistan — the mistaken application of military action there rather than the needed application of political action. I respectfully urge that you read the transcript of that segment of the program. My own great fear is that such military action, though you may be pressed by military proponents to take such action, will severely damage your Administration, in which so many have so much hope.

Sincerely yours,
- Barbara Walker
Granny Peace Brigade